Publicação em blog

Dear ReWorker: How Do I Rehire Employees Laid Off Due to Coronavirus?

Suzanne Lucas

Founder, Evil HR Lady

Dear ReWorker,

We recently had to lay off employees when the uncertainty of COVID hit. One of the first people we laid off was an employee that had performance and behavioral problems. We had multiple coaching sessions. We gave this employee multiple warnings. But nothing worked.

Fast forward six months: Things have picked up, and we have a few positions open. This employee privately messaged me and applied for an open position. How should I respond? And should we bring back other people when another round of closures could mean we’d have to lay people off again?

Sincerely,

To rehire or not to rehire

Dear Rehire,

Once upon a time, I got multiple phone calls from a former employee asking me about open positions. The HR system listed him as ineligible for rehire, but he insisted that that was an error—that his former boss told him he’d be first in line when a position opened up.

I called his former manager to see if the notation had, in fact, been an error. It had not. This employee was ineligible for rehire for performance reasons, but the manager had taken the "easy" way out and didn’t mention this to the former employee. (It was in his severance paperwork, but obviously, he thought it was an error.) I told the manager that the next time this hopeful former employee reached out to him, he was to say very clearly that it was time to move on—the company was not going to rehire him.

You need to do the same thing. Send a clear, straightforward message: "I appreciate your application, but we will not be moving forward." Then repeat that every time this person contacts you. Make sure this is consistent within your HR system and any other records. This person is ineligible for rehire, period.

Rehiring Employees Laid Off Due to Coronavirus

Now, let’s talk about rehiring in general. Your previous (eligible) employees should be your first choices. The main reason: They require the least amount of training, and you know what you’re getting. Yes, it’s an opportunity to move people around and hire from the outside if your laid off or furloughed employees aren’t a good fit, but they should be at least considered.

As the skills gap across organizations continues to widen, it’ll be harder than ever to find quality candidates. In a recent whitepaper, Cornerstone shared that 80% of CEOs seek a much broader range of skills for their company’s workforce than they currently have. If you had highly-skilled employees that you had to let go, take the opportunity to bring them back.

For the workers that do come back, consider a few things: your new(ish) employees will need some retraining. They will be concerned about company stability and they may be on the financial edge if they’ve been unemployed for the past several months.

My advice? Empower them from day one. Be sure to provide the same quality of onboarding experience that you’d deliver to brand new workers—whether it’s refreshing their knowledge of company processes or providing them with learning materials to catch up on any new tools you’ve implemented during the pandemic. It’s certain they’ll need resources to get up to speed.

And be extra compassionate toward them. They will need support and transparency, especially if you foresee another wave of shutdowns and subsequent layoffs. They know that another slam to the economy may result in layoffs, but let them know you’ll do everything you can to avoid this—which you should.

Finally, if you’re worried about the awkwardness of reaching back out to a laid-off employee, know this: For the most part, the people who have not found new jobs will be just as thrilled to be back to work as you are to have them back.

Sincerely,

Your ReWorker

For more advice from our ReWorker, read her column here.

Related Resources

Want to keep learning? Explore our products, customer stories, and the latest industry insights.

A New Poseidon Adventure: Flipping Succession Planning Upside Down

Publicação em blog

A New Poseidon Adventure: Flipping Succession Planning Upside Down

Organizations make significant investments in efforts to hire the right candidates – the people who have the right experience and cultural fit. By carefully managing the performance and potential of these people over time, the organization can grow its leadership pipeline, keep a steady inventory of needed skills and competencies and remain nimble in the face of change (which we have plenty of all around us these day) – all of which can have serious impact on the bottom line. However, much of this pie-in-the-sky stuff relies on being able to locate and cultivate high-potential and high-performing talent across the board. Without an integrated succession management solution, recognizing and developing talent can be an ever-elusive process. The questions we are seeing asked today include: does the traditional top-down approach to succession management still make enough of a difference? Does managing succession for a slim strata of senior executives take full advantage of the kinds of talent data we now have at our fingertips? It doesn’t have to be so. Succession management can be an interactive process between senior leadership, managers and employees at all levels of the organization. And, if we trust them, we can actually let employees become active participants in their own career development. (Shudder.) Career Management (Succession Planning Flipped Upside Down) This "bottom-up" approach is gaining momentum because who better to tell us about employee career path preferences than employees themselves. Organizations actually have talent management and other HR systems in place that allow for collecting and analyzing a whole slew of data around: Career history Career preferences Mobility preferences Professional and special skills Education achieved Competency ratings Performance scores Goal achievement Training and certifications Etc. In short, pretty much everything we’d want to know to make well-informed succession planning and talent pooling decisions. For some, the leap is simply putting some power into the employee’s hands. The talent management system of 2011 is capable of displaying a clear internal career path for employees and then, on the basis of all that data bulleted out above, showing a "Readiness Gap" – what do you need to do to make the step to the next level? And if your talent management environment comes armed with a real Learning Management System, you can take it to the next level with a dynamically generated development plan that gets the employee on the right path to actually closing those gaps. Faster development, faster mobility. Organizations that seriously favor internal mobility don’t just make employees stick on pre-defined career paths – they can search for ANY job in the company and check their Readiness levels. I might be in accounting today, but what I really want to do is move to marketing. Giving employees the chance to explore various career avenues within the organization helps assure that "water finds its level" – that is, that the right people with the right skills and the right levels of motivation and engagement find the right job roles internally. Employee participation is key, but make no mistake – managers play an important role in this interactive process. They must be prepared to provide career coaching, identify development opportunities and recommend employees for job openings. The candid discussions require that employees have open access to information so they can best understand the criteria necessary to move to the next level. A Two-Way Street Employee-driven career management is just one tool. The more traditional top-down approach to succession management remains indispensable. But organizations that value talent mobility and the ability to be able to shift and mobilize talent resources quickly will find that attention to career pathing can be vital. For employees, of course, the impacts are immediate and include boosted levels of engagement, higher retention, increased productivity and more.

The Hidden Costs of Ignoring Your Talent Management Strategy

Publicação em blog

The Hidden Costs of Ignoring Your Talent Management Strategy

Building and maintaining a successful company hinges on having the right people to execute projects and drive results. People, we hear time and again, are your company's most valuable asset. But their success — and HR's ability to recruit, engage and retain them — depends on HR pros who are strategic decision-makers, armed with the proper tools to let them excel at their jobs. Modern HR professionals manage much more than payroll and benefits. But their technology tools, in many cases, haven't evolved past basic productivity software like email or Microsoft Word. HR simply can't be strategic with old-school tools that reduce people to statistics and give little insight into what the numbers mean. Emails and spreadsheets were not designed to deliver meaningful insights into people's performance, suggest when employees should be promoted or highlight skills gaps in a company. For that, HR needs a broader, more strategic set of talent management tools, which lets professionals manage every aspect of the workforce, from training and performance reviews to collaboration and succession planning. Yet, research shows that less than 25% of companies use a unified, holistic approach to their talent management. The Real Costs of "Doing Nothing" As a Talent Management Strategy The critical relationship between business strategy and HR strategy too often gets overlooked by senior leadership. While it may seem like the company is saving money by managing recruiting, training, performance and succession via manual and paper-based processes, in reality it’s costing your business more than you know. For example: Without a talent management strategy, a company with 2,000 employees is losing almost $2 million every year in preventable turnover alone. Businesses that don’t invest in learning suffer from decreased employee performance and engagement to such a degree that they can expect to realize less than half the median revenue per employee. That’s a direct impact on the business. In employee performance management, organizations without a focused strategy waste up to 34 days each year managing underperformers and realize lower net income. To learn more about the business impact of talent management and how to start building out your strategy, check out the eBook Why Your Nonexistent Talent Management Strategy is Costing You Money (And How to Fix It) and register for the March 19th webinar, Building the Business Case for Talent Management.

The Return of the Moderate Merit Budget – Wreaking Havoc on Pay for Performance

Publicação em blog

The Return of the Moderate Merit Budget – Wreaking Havoc on Pay for Performance

With the economy now on steadier ground, most organizations have returned to administering a merit budget to the pre-recession levels of 3 to 3.5%. In the years immediately following the economic downturn, many merit budgets were eliminated entirely or were reduced significantly and reserved for a select segment of the employee population. Pay for performance has become a necessity for many organizations that are expected to accomplish more with fewer resources. I often get asked: "How can I truly award my top performers with such a limited budget? Should I do so at the expense of my ’Meets Expectations’ performers? What if I need to retain my ’Meets Expectations’ performers and giving them 0% to 2% increase puts me at great risk for turnover? But if I don’t recognize my top performers, don’t I risk losing them...?" These are difficult questions to answer, however you can determine the best solution for your organization by considering the following: Are your employees paid at market pay levels? Is your organization’s performance management process mature? Does your organization have other compensation programs in place to reward top performers (e.g. variable pay)? Market Pay If turnover is a concern, and your organization needs to maintain ’bench strength’ in order to achieve its strategic objectives, your biggest priority should be to ensure that you are paying your employees at market pay levels. Why? Historically, as the labor market strengthens, organizations become vulnerable in terms of losing people. Hiring and onboarding replacement talent is not only costly to the organization, but can also cause dissension among existing employees since new hires may be getting paid more. Be sure to stay abreast of market pay levels and trends, and use the merit budget to correct disparities. Performance Management Process Organizations vary significantly in terms of the maturity of their performance management process. Closely examine your organization’s process and look for ways to improve it. If there is a perception that one management team is an ’easier grader’ than the others, the process is inherently flawed and any pay for performance program will not be viewed as credible and fair by employees. A good place to start is to get a calibration process in place and communicate broad guidelines on expected distribution ratings. Variable Pay Programs Variable pay programs (e.g. bonuses) have become increasingly more popular across all industries and career levels. These programs provide the opportunity for employees to share in the organization’s success while not adding to fixed payroll costs. Some plans have an individual performance component which can be a very effective means to recognize top performers. However, in order for this type of program to be successful, individual goals and targets must be well documented and communicated. Again, this is largely based on the maturity of the organization’s performance management process which takes time to evolve. What are the best steps to avoid wreaking havoc on your pay for performance process? First ensure your pay levels are keeping pace with the market Continue to evolve your performance programs with calibration among managers and a rigorous goal setting process Promote variable pay plans to reward high performers without adding to fixed pay roll costs It’s not always an easy journey but, in the end, it’s best to use a measured approach that is based on business needs and a realistic assessment of your current programs and processes.

Agende uma conversa individual personalizada

Converse com um especialista da Cornerstone sobre como podemos atender às necessidades específicas de gestão de pessoas da sua organização.

© Cornerstone 2022
Avisos legais