In the first piece of this series, we focused on being reflective, or more specifically, reflecting on the priorities of your company’s business and how your people-focused priorities support the needs of the business. In part two of this series, we focus on getting to the ’So What, which involves building a case for certain software investments.’
STEP 2: Get to the ’So What’
Companies are like personalities; each one is unique. Getting to the ’So What' comes in three forms:
a) Understanding the personalities and priorities of the people involved in the decision-making process so they hear you;
b) Understanding that just switching software won’t magically get you to your ROI target;
c) Understanding what will deliver impact to the business.
Let’s break these down.
a) Understanding the Personalities and Priorities Involved
If it’s the CEO, s/he is going to want to understand how an investment in certain software supports the vision and advancement of the business.
If it’s the COO, s/he is going to want to understand how the investment will deliver improvement in critical business measures/ impact KPIs.
If it’s the CFO, s/he is going to need to see the impact of the investment over a three-to-five year period; understand how it's congruent with an appropriate discount rate and calculate it against the operating margin for benefits. which are revenue-centric. In other words, appreciate the mathematical detail in your business case.
If it's the CHRO, s/he is going to need to have confidence that alignment to the business is achievable. Achievable is the keyword here, and a perfect transition point to b) below.
b) Just Switching Software Won’t Magically Get You to Your ROI Target
Change can be expensive and is always disruptive. If you're comparing business cases from vendors you're considering and pick the one with the higher "ROI," it may not be a mistake, but I would argue that it does come with a degree of risk. For example, if you’re making a straight TCO (total cost of ownership) decision, and pick the lowest-cost option, then you're deciding on a single, although certainly important, data point.
It is at this point where people typically bucket benefits into two categories: Hard costs (TCO), and soft-costs (the fluffy stuff). For the term "soft-costs," I pull from my colleague Dr. Tom Tonkin who has a great quote on this point: "I like to call soft-costs the ’harder costs.'" I could not agree more. Soft costs are not fluffy at all. They are truly the hardest costs to achieve and are typically the ones that move the business. Soft-costs don't just happen; they require user adoption: use of the system, and adoption of the processes. If you fail to address this as a part of your business case you should expect it to be raised as an objection when you present. I've seen it before, "...and how do you expect to do this exactly?" A C-level executive who is not close to your day-to-day will ask that question. My point: Don’t just focus on the numbers Give attention and detail to explain how the investment will affect change in the organization, i.e., the "so what."
c) Understanding What Will Genuinely Deliver Impact to the Business
I think it’s natural for HR & talent specialists to focus on efficiency measures instead of effectiveness measures. Although efficiency measures are good, effectiveness improvements are better:
When it comes to calculating any benefit, I offer these points to consider:
- Calculate your impact over a five-year investment horizon versus a three-year. Why? It may take your organization three years to fully implement and for all employees to adopt the use of the new system. You do not want to leave yourself with little-to-no runway to recoup the investment.
- If you’re calculating revenue (top-line) impacts, net those impacts against your operating margin. You still have to account for business costs.
- Be comfortable with the assumptive improvements you use, such as the following. If you have that funny feeling in your gut, adjust:
- The percent of turnover reduced.
- The percent decrease in time to productivity.
- Customer conversion improvement percentages (ex. retail spending).
Don't forget to address the elimination of legacy costs, areas such as previous licensing / subscription / maintenance / support costs. This would also include reducing any previously required integrations, physical space, etc.
You will find overlap when thinking about benefits that align with the priorities you set, and that’s okay. That said, be sure to prioritize based on what will move your business, and that only comes from truly being reflective, which will, in turn, help you get to the "so what."
With parts one and two now behind us, be on the lookout for the final installment focusing on delivering the story you are now in the final stages of completing.
 Source: Bersin & Associates, CedarCrestone
 Bersin & Associates, CedarCrestone
Header photo: Creative Commons
Want to keep learning? Explore our products, customer stories, and the latest industry insights.
고객 및 파트너와의 탄탄한 관계 구축
업무 환경이 빠르게 변화하는 현실에서 귀사는 역동적이고 적응력이 뛰어나야 합니다. 중요한 외부 이해 당사자와 탄탄한 관계를 형성하려면 전보다 훨씬 조직적으로 요구에 부응할 수 있어야 합니다. 유연성과 고유함을 갖춰 귀사의 비즈니스에 맞게 구축이 가능한 Cornerstone Extended Enterprise 는 귀사의 성장에 맞게 확장할 수 있으며, 외부 고객에게 충분한 정보를 제공하여 최신 오퍼링을 채택할 확률을 높여드립니다.
Cornerstone 스킬 그래프 기술 데이터시트
Cornerstone 스킬 그래프는 스킬을 중심으로 인재 전략을 구성하는 가장 좋은 방법입니다. 어떤 Cornerstone 제품을 사용하던 관계없이, 지능형 온톨로지에 접근할 수 있습니다. 지능형 온톨로지는 2억 5천만 가지 역할 전반에 걸쳐 53,000 가지가 넘는 스킬로 구성되어 있으며 모든 직원 프로필이 담겨 있습니다.