Assumptions are often an inevitable part of quick decision making, but accepting assumptions as fact can be harmful to your business and employees.
I learned this the hard way years ago when I was part of a performance management platform implementation at LandAmerica Financial Group. The platform was "state-of-the-art," and we were excited to have access to data about performance, given that up until that point, we had no quantifiable way to measure it. But midway through implementation we realized that more than half of the executives who would have to use the program lacked the computer skills required for the new technology.
In this case, we had assumed everyone had the same level of IT experience as the HR department—and didn't think too much about other potential users. Our assumptions led to a swift but ultimately bad decision that damaged our internal reputation and frustrated users. In order to prevent this from happening in the future, I came up with a quick checklist to ensure we wouldn't make the same mistake again.
Follow these three steps and leave your assumptions behind in favor of a more strategic decision-making process—one that will be particularly useful for implementing new software.
1) Organize the Decision-Making Process
One way to get more strategic about decision-making is to use organizational tools that guide the thinking process. These tools help sort, synthesize and analyze relevant data. And there are hundreds available, ranging from simple brainstorming technologies to complex ones. Tools that automate the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) approach to decision-making, for example, help establish a disciplined, checklist-driven process for taking actions.
Process-oriented software can help streamline tough organizational problems, such as implementing a new technology. A good decision making tool will help you identify all key stakeholders, involve them in the process and give them the opportunity to weigh in, which will make decision-making more thorough and fact-based, rather than assumption-based.
2) Ask Yourself Tough Questions
Proactively anticipating the challenges that will arise as a result of any decision you make can go a long way in preventing potential pitfalls. Here are three basic questions that you should always ask before making decisions that involve others.
- Does the company have adequate resources? Most implementations require parallel processes—keeping the old process going, while testing a new one. But if the employees tasked with maintaining both the new and the old are already overloaded, they won't be credible testers. To determine if you have the right resources, you need empirical data including the volume of work being added, the volume of work being phased out, and the bandwidth of existing staff.
- Do workers have the required skills and knowledge? A collective discussion that compares the current process with the new process can raise knowledge requirements that you may not be considering.
- Is this the right time? If your resources will be insufficient, or if you determine there is re-skilling necessary, you must challenge your timeline. If the timing is cast in concrete, at least you'll be aware of potential deficiencies going in, and can address them.
3) Call on Colleagues to Speak Up
Challenging colleagues to voice their concerns about upcoming decisions and changes offers a depth of review. This is critical because the more input you gather before, during and after a new implementation, the more ownership people will feel for the end product. And a greater sense of ownership means workers are more likely to get on board with a decision that has been made, and do what it takes to make it work.
Failing to solicit input from the entire team that'll be impacted by a decision too often results in hiccups during implementation—such as people not having the skills required to use the technology—which in turn can lead to lack of adoption.
Bringing all stakeholders into a decision and listening carefully to their input can help lead to better decision-making overall. One lesson that has stayed with me throughout my career is that there are buried landmines of assumptions in every decision, and the more people that look at their decisions, the greater their chance of finding these landmines before its too late.
Photo: Creative Commons
Ressourcen zu diesem Thema
Sie möchten noch mehr erfahren? Entdecken Sie unsere Produkte, Kundenberichte und aktuelle Brancheneinblicke.
Blogbeitrag
10 Erfolgstipps für Ihr One-to-One Meeting
Die besten Teams erleben regelmäßig etwas, das sie sinnvoll weiterbringt und beflügelt: gute Gespräche mit ihren Führungskräften. Andere Teams nehmen widerwillig Platz im stundenlangen Horrorkabinett schlecht vorbereiteter Gespräche ohne Fokus und ohne Spaß. Es geht aber auch anders – wenn die Führungskräfte den Gesprächen bewusst einen echten Nutzen verleihen. Wie das funktioniert? Eigentlich ist es ganz einfach – bereiten Sie das Einzelgespräch mit Mitarbeiter:innen so gut vor wie ein wichtiges Kundengespräch: klare Agenda, aktives Zuhören, ein Austausch auf Augenhöhe, echtes Interesse, gemeinsame Ziele.
Blogbeitrag
Die wahre Bedeutung von Wertschätzung
Es ist schön, wenn man gelobt wird, von wem auch immer, vom Chef, von Kollegen oder von Kunden. Keine Frage. Natürlich wünscht man sich, dass die eigene Leistung, der eigene Beitrag sichtbar wird und Anerkennung findet. Und so wundert es nicht, wenn Mitarbeiter genau dies wünschen. Dies findet unter anderem seinen Widerhall in den üblichen Mitarbeiterbefragungen, in denen wiederholt und in vielen Unternehmen zum Ausdruck kommt, die Mitarbeiter wünschten sich mehr Wertschätzung.
Blogbeitrag
Die Führungskraft als Coach
Eine traditionelle Führungskraft kennt die Antworten auf dringende Fragen und Lösungen für akute Probleme. Deshalb ist sie Führungskraft. Sie ist es gewohnt, täglich auf Fragen, wie „Was sollen wir tun?“ oder „Ist das so in Ordnung?“ reagieren zu müssen. In vielen Teams und Organisationen ist das so, und die Geführten erwarten von ihren Führungskräften eine entsprechende Reaktion.