This article is part of our monthly TED Talk Tuesday series, spotlighting can't-miss TED Talks and their key takeaways. You can learn more about our partnership with TED here.
In today's world, trust is hard to come by. Backlash to authority and populist anger in the face of any public figure or business's wrongdoing is the norm. One international survey found that the average level of trust in business, media, government and NGO institutions is below 50%. Over 70% of survey respondents said government officials are not at all or only somewhat credible, and 63% said the same about CEOs.
Although the world's great decline in trust is a widely held and statistically-backed belief, Onora O'Neill disagrees with this stance. O'Neill is a philosopher and a crossbench member of the House of Lords in the British Parliament who believes that we are not losing trust, we are incorrectly measuring and creating it.
Many companies today misunderstand trust and suffer because of it, she says. When a workplace lacks trust, employees feel impotent and gradually lose efficiency. And when employers misunderstand how to properly foster trust with their employees, both parties become uncommunicative and negative towards one another. In her TED Talk, O'Neill explains how trust should be measured, created and fostered in both ordinary life and the workplace.
Watch the video below and read on for three key takeaways from her talk.
"Polls do not accurately measure trust, action does."
According to O'Neill, surveys and opinion polls do not measure trust but merely collect attitudes given in response to a specific question. These methods measure feelings, and trust is not based in feelings alone. In the workplace, for example, trust is formed when words and feelings inspire action, and when expectations are mutually understood, set and met.
Employees create trust when they act on and accomplish what employers expect of them— delivering assignments and taking care of responsibilities in a timely and efficient manner goes a long way in earning a manager's trust. On the flipside, when employers invest capital and time in employee development, that builds trust too, as does transparency between employees and employers about company news and decisions.
"More trust is not an intelligent aim in this life."
We don't need more trust. Instead, O'Neill believes what we actually need is more intelligently-placed trust. We need to analyze a person's strengths and weaknesses before determining how we should trust them.
O'Neill's idea of intelligent trust is a great learning for today's employers. If employers want to intelligently trust their employees, they must connect with them to locate personal motivations, strengths and weaknesses. This helps them place trust in their strengths, while staying in tune with possible weaknesses. Employees should similarly examine their employers for strengths and weaknesses to decide how much they should trust them and in what ways. In order to foster this mutual, intelligent trust, employers and employees should organize monthly meetings, scheduled check-ins and practice transparency regularly.
"Give people adequate, useful and simple evidence that you're trustworthy."
Because it's given by others, trust must be earned. So how can workers effectively do this? O'Neill recommends using vulnerability because when you allow yourself to be vulnerable to another party, it's evident that you have confidence in what you are doing and saying.
At work, by remaining authentic and refusing to hide their emotional truths, employers can create work environments where employees feel comfortable discussing their uncertainties and stressors. What's more, employers can use these open discussions to learn from employees about any difficulties at work. This information is crucial if an employer hopes to help an employee grow and develop, but it can only be accessed if an employee trusts their employer enough to tell them.
As citizens, humans, students or employers, we need to think much less about trust and the attitudes reflected in opinion polls and much more about being trustworthy and how we all give people adequate, useful and simple evidence for how we can be trusted.
Header photo: TED
Ressourcen zu diesem Thema
Sie möchten noch mehr erfahren? Entdecken Sie unsere Produkte, Kundenberichte und aktuelle Brancheneinblicke.
Blogbeitrag
Die wahre Bedeutung von Wertschätzung
Es ist schön, wenn man gelobt wird, von wem auch immer, vom Chef, von Kollegen oder von Kunden. Keine Frage. Natürlich wünscht man sich, dass die eigene Leistung, der eigene Beitrag sichtbar wird und Anerkennung findet. Und so wundert es nicht, wenn Mitarbeiter genau dies wünschen. Dies findet unter anderem seinen Widerhall in den üblichen Mitarbeiterbefragungen, in denen wiederholt und in vielen Unternehmen zum Ausdruck kommt, die Mitarbeiter wünschten sich mehr Wertschätzung.
Blogbeitrag
Die Führungskraft als Coach
Eine traditionelle Führungskraft kennt die Antworten auf dringende Fragen und Lösungen für akute Probleme. Deshalb ist sie Führungskraft. Sie ist es gewohnt, täglich auf Fragen, wie „Was sollen wir tun?“ oder „Ist das so in Ordnung?“ reagieren zu müssen. In vielen Teams und Organisationen ist das so, und die Geführten erwarten von ihren Führungskräften eine entsprechende Reaktion.
Blogbeitrag
Problemlösen als Lernstrategie
Ein Mitarbeiter findet sich in einer Situation wieder, in der er ein Problem lösen soll, es aber nicht kann. Dies kann auch auf ganze Teams zutreffen. Man denke hier an sehr unterschiedliche Umstände. Wie wendet man nochmal den Spaltenverweis in Excel an? Wie gewinnen wir Marktanteile in Osteuropa? Wie geht man mit einem konkreten Konflikt um? Wie reagiert man auf den Absturz eines IT-Systems? Die Welt ist ein Universum solcher Situationen. Nun passiert irgendetwas, das dazu führt, dass die Betroffenen das Problem lösen können. Dieses „irgendetwas“ nennt man Lernen. Akademisch ausgedrückt ist Lernen nichts anderes, als eine Transformation eines Mitarbeiters, eines Teams oder einer ganzen Organisation aus dem Zustand der Überforderung in einen Zustand der Problemlösefähigkeit.