Publicación de blog

Learning Corner with Jeffrey Pfeffer: Less Is Better Than More When it Comes to Incentives

Jeffrey Pfeffer

Professor of Organizational Behavior, Stanford University

Some years ago, Men's Wearhouse founder George Zimmer came to a class I taught to discuss a case study I had written on his company.

Zimmer commented on a bonus program I had written about where each store employee (except the store manager) would receive $20 if the store met its "good" sales target for the month, and $40 if it met its "excellent" sales goal. My students thought these amounts were quite small, but Zimmer thought the incentives were perfectly sized. They were large enough to provide some recognition of store achievement, he said, but more importantly, the payouts gave people a chance to celebrate success together without being large enough to distort people's behaviors.

Zimmer's insight that, in the case of incentives, less is often better than more is too infrequently embraced by leaders who instead seek to use substantial rewards to fundamentally channel behavior.

HR Managers and c-suite executives would do well to learn from Zimmer's wisdom. While most employees today assume incentives will be part of their job, how large they are and how they are presented can substantially impact an organization.

Incentives Can Undermine or Crowd Out Intrinsic Motivation

Beginning in the 1970s, studies in psychology found that providing people rewards—extrinsic incentives—could undermine intrinsic motivation for engaging in inherently interesting tasks. One theory suggested that people found incentives controlling, and rebelled against attempts to control their behavior. Another perspective suggested that people interpreted incentives as signaling that a task was inherently unpleasant, reducing their interest in doing it. The takeaway? Incentives have the potential to reduce people's motivation and interest in tasks.

Even economists, who have traditionally looked more favorably on incentives, have also argued that incentives can backfire. They argue that providing extrinsic incentives "crowds out" intrinsic interests in doing something. Consequently, incentives can backfire, and make it less likely that people will do what the incentives want them to do. For instance, one study observed that parents were more often late in picking up their children from a day care center when a fine was imposed, while yet other researchers observed that volunteers who were paid a small amount worked fewer hours than volunteers who were not paid. Here, the evidence suggests that using incentives to drive desired behavior may not work.

Consistent with the idea that smaller is better, smaller incentives will be less likely to crowd out or reduce intrinsic motivation because smaller incentives are less psychologically prominent and salient. For organizations concerned about maintaining intrinsic task motivation—which is probably most workplaces—the crowding out and undermining research provides one more reason to be cautious in the use of incentives.

Incentives Drive Behavior, But in Often Unanticipated—and Counterproductive—Ways

As Bob Sutton and I pointed out in our book on evidence-based management, a huge problem with incentives is that they are too effective at influencing behaviors. And most people and companies aren't great at anticipating how behaviors will change in response to incentives. There are enough examples of this to fill a book—or maybe several.

In 2018, William Dudley, CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, noted that "misaligned incentives contributed greatly to the 2008 financial crisis." In the scenario that Dudley is referring to, many mortgage brokers were compensated for the number of loans they made—not necessarily for making sound loans that would be repaid. And many of the incentives for mortgage brokers for senior financial industry executives were short-term rewards. Meanwhile, the assets being created (the loans) and the financial results were inherently longer-term. The time horizon on incentives needs to match the time horizon of the results being affective. Simply put, short-term incentives aren't going to be very good for creating long-term results.

How to Make Incentives Work

Based on extensive empirical evidence, there are some simple but important implications for implementing incentives in ways that aren't likely to cause misbehavior that adversely affects organizations.

First, and most importantly, keep incentives small enough to not overly influence behavior. That may seem counterintuitive—many workplaces implement incentives precisely to influence behavior—but, as noted, people are often quite bad at predicting the ways in which incentives may drive behavior.

Second, spend time trying to anticipate how people could achieve the goals signaled by incentives in ways that are harmful to the organization's interests and try to put up various guardrails to detect and deter such behavior. One way to do this, is to monitor how rewards are being received and the behaviors associated with them based on consistent conversations with employees who are benefiting from the rewards program.

And third, if incentives are driving bad behavior, don't do what many workplaces do, which is to try and solve an incentive-based problem by implementing even more incentives. Many companies try to use incentives to substitute for leadership (coaching and feedback) or a strong, positive organizational culture. As research going back decades from places like shows, leader behavior matters a lot in motivating performance and reducing turnover. Incentives are a poor substitute.

In the case of incentives, the inescapable conclusion is that less—less reliance, less use, less magnitude—is most often better than more.

Photo: Unsplash

Related Resources

Want to keep learning? Explore our products, customer stories, and the latest industry insights.

Introducing Sonae IM's transformational HR strategy

Historia de cliente

Introducing Sonae IM's transformational HR strategy

João Moutinho, Head of HR at Sonae IM, talks about the challenges of balancing Sonae IM’s HR strategy with its investment strategy and how a single platform for learning was needed to unify processes. With the help of Cornerstone, Sonae IM developed SAM, a self-service platform designed to enhance its 1,500+ employees’ learning experience. Since developing SAM, Sonae IM has seen a huge increase in engagement, with all employees accessing SAM on a weekly basis and more than 30% of employees accessing the platform daily.

Ofrezca un aprendizaje continuo y personalizado para todos

Hoja informativa

Ofrezca un aprendizaje continuo y personalizado para todos

La capacitación, las habilidades y la planificación de la sucesión son los elementos que impulsan el éxito de su personal y su organización. Con Cornerstone Learning, puede poner a sus empleados al volante de su propio desarrollo y alinear su aprendizaje con los objetivos y estrategias de su empresa para mejorar el rendimiento, mantener la competitividad y mejorar el compromiso del personal.

Cofares mejora la formación de sus empleados con Cornerstone

Publicación de blog

Cofares mejora la formación de sus empleados con Cornerstone

Cofares, la mayor distribuidora farmacéutica en España, está implementando soluciones de Cornerstone OnDemand para mejorar su servicio y sus procesos de compras a las empresas farmacéuticas, así como para potenciar la formación que ofrece a sus empleados. Según el informe que Cornerstone e ICD presentaron, “Impulsando la cultura de la innovación en la era de la transformación digital”, Cofares responde al arquetipo de música clásica, es decir, su nivel de innovación es básico. Por ello, su gran apuesto por la tecnología de Cornerstone que les ayude a mejorar su nivel de digitalización y transformación. Así Ángel Javier Vicente Pérez, Director de Recursos Humanos, Servicios Generales y RSC de Cofares asegura que el mayor reto de recursos humanos en su Grupo es “adaptarse a la digitalización, sobre todo a nuestros profesionales que tienen que hacer frente a la gran velocidad de los cambios que hoy experimentamos”. Un desafío en el que Cofares ha elegido a Cornestone. Eligen Cornerstone por ofrecer una solución integral, sus años de experiencia a nivel mundial y de haber trabajado con grandes compañías para así poder “aplicar las best practices” en Cofares. Tras implantar las soluciones de Cornerstone en su empresa, Ángel Javier Vicente asegura que el mayor impacto “lo hemos visto en los empleados, en la evolución del rendimiento de los equipos a través de con los mandos intermedios con más comunicación entre ellos y más transversalidad y eso impacta también en el negocio”. Explotar todo el potencial de Big Data para mejorar la experiencia de cliente y empleados, de quienes ya tienen un feedback muy favorable dada la sencillez de la herramienta y el fácil acceso por ser soluciones en la nube. Este es su objetivo inmediato y cuentan con Cornerstone para conseguirlo.

Concierte una reunión individual personalizada

Hable con un experto de Cornerstone sobre cómo podemos ayudarle a satisfacer las necesidades de gestión de personal particulares de su organización.

© Cornerstone 2022
Aviso legal