What is the most pivotal work your company does? Breakthrough innovation? High-profile clients? Big-picture strategy? Patent protection? Typically, such work requires skills that are both unique and valuable.
Common wisdom — and some human capital theory — holds that organizations should always engage unique and pivotal talent by hiring regular full-time employees, so they are both readily available and protected from competitors.
But it may be time to rethink the standard. The traditional way of working with unique and valuable talent is being challenged by emerging work arrangements that go beyond employment. Today, the decision between hiring and outsourcing talent depends not only on whether the talent is unique, but also on the type of uniqueness.
The Traditional Argument: Hire Valuable Talent (Unique or Not)
A widely cited article on human resource architecture by David Lepak and Scott Snell defined two dimensions of human capital: (1) "uniqueness" and (2) "strategic value."
For talent with high strategic value and high uniqueness, Lepak and Snell recommend organizations rely on long-term employment and development. For high strategic value and low uniqueness, they tout "job-based employment to perform predetermined tasks." For talent with low strategic value but high uniqueness, they recommend alliances. It is only for talent with low strategic value and low uniqueness that they promote outsourcing — which echoes traditional employment-focused HR practices.
However, looking a bit deeper reveals hidden value in outsourcing. In "Lead the Work," my co-authors and I show that talent networks, professional services organizations and outsourcing platforms have evolved from simple job matching services to sophisticated work ecosystems. You can increasingly look beyond employment to find unique workers who can perform pivotal work. In addition, those unique workers may prefer project-based engagements to working full-time — freelancers in the gig economy offer increasingly varied talent options.
So, how should you decide whether to employ or outsource talent? It requires an understanding of the different kinds of uniqueness.
Talent Is Unique In Different Ways
Human capital can be "unique" in two ways: (1) unique to your specific organization or (2) unique to your specific industry. Let's say your company is applying for a patent for a new product: A patent lawyer with organization-specific uniqueness would be an expert in patents affecting product lines or technologies unique to your company. On the other hand, a patent lawyer with industry-specific uniqueness would be an expert on patents relating to products and processes throughout your industry, across many companies.
It may be best to hire the organization-specific unique patent lawyer, but to outsource the industry-specific unique patent lawyer.
Why? Research by Kyle Mayer, Deepak Somaya and Ian Williamson suggests that an external law firm can offer many more opportunities for lawyers to hone their skills industry-wide, because the law firm can be the outsourced provider of work to many individual companies and can afford to compensate industry-specific unique lawyers highly.
The same thing is true for talent platforms — they can attract the very best of the best in industry-specific areas such as graphic arts or software coding.
Deconstruct Jobs to Reveal Uniqueness Opportunities
Following traditional logic, a company might hire a worker with industry-specific uniqueness, but such full-time employment can actually reduce those skills. Indeed, not employing industry-specific talent may be the best way to keep their skills finely honed.
Returning to the patent lawyer example, a lawyer at a single company will likely spend time on work that is not related to their industry-specific skills, compared to lawyers that work more consistently on industry-specific projects. Supporting this, Mayer, Somaya and Williamson found that companies often outsource industry-specific legal work, particularly in highly-litigated areas. So, before you assume you must hire unique talent, consider outsourcing for highly skilled and pivotal work.
HR leaders must equip their organizations to deconstruct work, look inside the "job," and think about what type of unique talent is needed. By "deconstructing" typical work systems, leaders will find new uses for outsourcing and build a smarter talent structure.
Photo: Creative Commons
Want to keep learning? Explore our products, customer stories, and the latest industry insights.
You, Me, We – Managing the Talent Experience
Today’s world is incredibly unpredictable. Think of all the upheavals businesses have had to weather in recent years, from Brexit, to COVID-19, the Great Resignation, and more. Even before this, there was the 2008 financial meltdown. All of this impacts the world of work, meaning organisations must always prepare for times of instability.
Unlocking your team's potential: enabling career growth for greater success
In today's job market, one roadblock organisations often deal with when trying to hold on to employees is a concept called “talent hoarding.” Talent hoarding occurs when a manager holds tightly to an employee because they view that person as an essential asset to their team. Losing this person would likely create a hole in the department that the manager may consider challenging or inconvenient to fill.
Who cares about employee experience - a webinar with Ben Whitter
Employee experience once came down solely to a desk, office space, and possibly some free cake at the coffee station. This has completely transformed in recent years, the initial catalyst being the pandemic. The mass exodus from the workplace forced employers to rethink the employee experience (EX), as keeping morale high and workers connected to each other was paramount. However, even in the aftermath of Covid-19, the EX has continued to evolve.